ZDRAVÝ ŽIVOTNÝ ŠTÝL • POZNANIE • SEBAROZVOJ

Whoa! I remember the first time I scanned a WalletConnect QR and almost approved a request without reading it. Really? Yep. My instinct said “somethin’ smells off” because the dApp UI looked fine, but the signature payload did not. That gut hit saved me from signing a permit that would have drained tokens later. I’m biased, but those small moments shape how I evaluate every wallet now.

Okay, so check this out—WalletConnect is the plumbing that lets mobile wallets and browser dApps talk without exposing private keys. Medium-level explanation first: it establishes a session, negotiates chains and methods, and forwards RPC calls through a relay or bridge. Longer thought: since sessions can span hours or days, that session is effectively a long-lived permission grant, and any weak link in pairing, metadata verification, or request approval can become an attack vector that attackers will happily exploit if you give them the chance.

WalletConnect sounds simple. It isn’t. On the surface it’s a QR, a handshake, and a stream of JSON-RPC. But beneath that you get namespaces, permissions, and trust assumptions that vary between v1 and v2. Initially I thought v2 fixed everything—more structured namespaces, wildcards handled better, and a clearer path for multiple chains. Actually, wait—let me rephrase that: v2 reduced some ambiguity, but it also added complexity that developers and users can misconfigure, which creates its own risks.

Rabby Wallet interface showing a WalletConnect session and permission prompts

How Rabby Wallet tackles the real-world threats

I’ve used Rabby enough to notice the patterns. Rabby doesn’t pretend to be a silver bullet, though. It adds layered defenses: visible session metadata, granular permission controls, explicit chain switching prompts, and a transaction confirmation flow that highlights unusual parameters. When a dApp requests a signature, Rabby surfaces the call intent, the contract being targeted, and—critically—the spender address, so you can see who will be authorized. Visit the rabby wallet official site to see screenshots and docs if you want to poke around yourself.

Short version: don’t blind-approve. Medium detail: check the contract address and calldata when possible. Longer takeaway: if a wallet makes those details hard to find, that’s a usability problem that quickly becomes a security problem because users will ignore it or make mistakes under pressure.

Here’s what bugs me about many WalletConnect flows. Developers often request broad allowances—permits with open-ended spend rights or approvals that cover multiple tokens. That is a recipe for later grief. My approach is procedural